Perceived prominence and scale types

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Perceived prominence and scale types. / Tøndering, John; Jensen, Christian.

Proceedings Fonetik 2005: the XVIIIth Swedish Phonetics Conference, May 25–27, 2005, Göteborg. red. / Anders Eriksson; Jonas Lindh. 2005. s. 111-114.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Tøndering, J & Jensen, C 2005, Perceived prominence and scale types. i A Eriksson & J Lindh (red), Proceedings Fonetik 2005: the XVIIIth Swedish Phonetics Conference, May 25–27, 2005, Göteborg. s. 111-114, Fonetik 2005, Göteborg, Sverige, 25/05/2005.

APA

Tøndering, J., & Jensen, C. (2005). Perceived prominence and scale types. I A. Eriksson, & J. Lindh (red.), Proceedings Fonetik 2005: the XVIIIth Swedish Phonetics Conference, May 25–27, 2005, Göteborg (s. 111-114)

Vancouver

Tøndering J, Jensen C. Perceived prominence and scale types. I Eriksson A, Lindh J, red., Proceedings Fonetik 2005: the XVIIIth Swedish Phonetics Conference, May 25–27, 2005, Göteborg. 2005. s. 111-114

Author

Tøndering, John ; Jensen, Christian. / Perceived prominence and scale types. Proceedings Fonetik 2005: the XVIIIth Swedish Phonetics Conference, May 25–27, 2005, Göteborg. red. / Anders Eriksson ; Jonas Lindh. 2005. s. 111-114

Bibtex

@inproceedings{80b5aaa0a36411debc73000ea68e967b,
title = "Perceived prominence and scale types",
abstract = "Three different scales which have been used to measure perceived prominence are evaluated in a perceptual experiment. Average scores of raters using a multi-level (31-point) scale, a simple binary (2-point) scale and an intermediate 4-point scale are almost identical. The potentially finer gradation possible with the multilevel scale(s) is compensated for by having multiple listeners, which is a also a requirement for obtaining reliable data. In other words, a high number of levels is neither a sufficient nor a necessary requirement. Overall the best results were obtained using the 4-point scale, and there seems to be little justification for using a 31-point scale.",
author = "John T{\o}ndering and Christian Jensen",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
isbn = "91-973895-9-5",
pages = "111--114",
editor = "Anders Eriksson and Jonas Lindh",
booktitle = "Proceedings Fonetik 2005",
note = "null ; Conference date: 25-05-2005 Through 27-05-2005",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Perceived prominence and scale types

AU - Tøndering, John

AU - Jensen, Christian

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Three different scales which have been used to measure perceived prominence are evaluated in a perceptual experiment. Average scores of raters using a multi-level (31-point) scale, a simple binary (2-point) scale and an intermediate 4-point scale are almost identical. The potentially finer gradation possible with the multilevel scale(s) is compensated for by having multiple listeners, which is a also a requirement for obtaining reliable data. In other words, a high number of levels is neither a sufficient nor a necessary requirement. Overall the best results were obtained using the 4-point scale, and there seems to be little justification for using a 31-point scale.

AB - Three different scales which have been used to measure perceived prominence are evaluated in a perceptual experiment. Average scores of raters using a multi-level (31-point) scale, a simple binary (2-point) scale and an intermediate 4-point scale are almost identical. The potentially finer gradation possible with the multilevel scale(s) is compensated for by having multiple listeners, which is a also a requirement for obtaining reliable data. In other words, a high number of levels is neither a sufficient nor a necessary requirement. Overall the best results were obtained using the 4-point scale, and there seems to be little justification for using a 31-point scale.

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 91-973895-9-5

SP - 111

EP - 114

BT - Proceedings Fonetik 2005

A2 - Eriksson, Anders

A2 - Lindh, Jonas

Y2 - 25 May 2005 through 27 May 2005

ER -

ID: 14490332