Expertise in the Age of Post-Factual politics: An outline of reflexive strategies

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Standard

Expertise in the Age of Post-Factual politics : An outline of reflexive strategies. / Berling, Trine Villumsen; Bueger, Christian.

In: Geoforum, Vol. 84, 01.08.2017, p. 332-341.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Berling, TV & Bueger, C 2017, 'Expertise in the Age of Post-Factual politics: An outline of reflexive strategies', Geoforum, vol. 84, pp. 332-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.008

APA

Berling, T. V., & Bueger, C. (2017). Expertise in the Age of Post-Factual politics: An outline of reflexive strategies. Geoforum, 84, 332-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.008

Vancouver

Berling TV, Bueger C. Expertise in the Age of Post-Factual politics: An outline of reflexive strategies. Geoforum. 2017 Aug 1;84:332-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.008

Author

Berling, Trine Villumsen ; Bueger, Christian. / Expertise in the Age of Post-Factual politics : An outline of reflexive strategies. In: Geoforum. 2017 ; Vol. 84. pp. 332-341.

Bibtex

@article{e7f95dd09a314e05b01d14fee292302d,
title = "Expertise in the Age of Post-Factual politics: An outline of reflexive strategies",
abstract = "What has become known as post-factual politics poses particular challenges to the role of expertise, calling for a new type of reflexivity able to inform scholarly strategies towards policy. Taking recent literature on the {\textquoteleft}practice turn{\textquoteright} as our point of departure, we argue for introducing a sense of {\textquoteleft}practical reflexivity{\textquoteright} that can provide guidance for the practice of scholars. Practical reflexivity focuses on the everyday practices of scholars rather than epistemic ideals or formal methodological rules. It directs our attention to the relation between academic and other practices. At this conjunction, several practical challenges arise. We discuss three major challenges and identify them as the epistemic, the autonomy and the performativity dilemmas. To seek answers to these, we explore the repertoire provided by three reflexive strategies outlined in neo-Gramscianism, Bourdieusian praxeology and pragmatism. The outcome is a tool for rethinking the relation between everyday practices of scholars and non-scholarly practices that may be usefully adopted in the current situation.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, Post-factual politics, practical reflexivity, Bourdieu, Pierre, Gramsci, Antonio, Rorty",
author = "Berling, {Trine Villumsen} and Christian Bueger",
year = "2017",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.008",
language = "English",
volume = "84",
pages = "332--341",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expertise in the Age of Post-Factual politics

T2 - An outline of reflexive strategies

AU - Berling, Trine Villumsen

AU - Bueger, Christian

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - What has become known as post-factual politics poses particular challenges to the role of expertise, calling for a new type of reflexivity able to inform scholarly strategies towards policy. Taking recent literature on the ‘practice turn’ as our point of departure, we argue for introducing a sense of ‘practical reflexivity’ that can provide guidance for the practice of scholars. Practical reflexivity focuses on the everyday practices of scholars rather than epistemic ideals or formal methodological rules. It directs our attention to the relation between academic and other practices. At this conjunction, several practical challenges arise. We discuss three major challenges and identify them as the epistemic, the autonomy and the performativity dilemmas. To seek answers to these, we explore the repertoire provided by three reflexive strategies outlined in neo-Gramscianism, Bourdieusian praxeology and pragmatism. The outcome is a tool for rethinking the relation between everyday practices of scholars and non-scholarly practices that may be usefully adopted in the current situation.

AB - What has become known as post-factual politics poses particular challenges to the role of expertise, calling for a new type of reflexivity able to inform scholarly strategies towards policy. Taking recent literature on the ‘practice turn’ as our point of departure, we argue for introducing a sense of ‘practical reflexivity’ that can provide guidance for the practice of scholars. Practical reflexivity focuses on the everyday practices of scholars rather than epistemic ideals or formal methodological rules. It directs our attention to the relation between academic and other practices. At this conjunction, several practical challenges arise. We discuss three major challenges and identify them as the epistemic, the autonomy and the performativity dilemmas. To seek answers to these, we explore the repertoire provided by three reflexive strategies outlined in neo-Gramscianism, Bourdieusian praxeology and pragmatism. The outcome is a tool for rethinking the relation between everyday practices of scholars and non-scholarly practices that may be usefully adopted in the current situation.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - Post-factual politics

KW - practical reflexivity

KW - Bourdieu, Pierre

KW - Gramsci, Antonio

KW - Rorty

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.008

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.05.008

M3 - Journal article

VL - 84

SP - 332

EP - 341

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

ER -

ID: 179050383