Why withdrawal from the European Union is undemocratic

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Why withdrawal from the European Union is undemocratic. / Olsen, Tore Vincents; Rostbøll, Christian F.

In: International Theory, Vol. 9, No. 3, 11.2017, p. 436-465.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Olsen, TV & Rostbøll, CF 2017, 'Why withdrawal from the European Union is undemocratic', International Theory, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 436-465. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971917000094

APA

Olsen, T. V., & Rostbøll, C. F. (2017). Why withdrawal from the European Union is undemocratic. International Theory, 9(3), 436-465. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971917000094

Vancouver

Olsen TV, Rostbøll CF. Why withdrawal from the European Union is undemocratic. International Theory. 2017 Nov;9(3):436-465. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971917000094

Author

Olsen, Tore Vincents ; Rostbøll, Christian F. / Why withdrawal from the European Union is undemocratic. In: International Theory. 2017 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 436-465.

Bibtex

@article{2443aae7a2ec4f8f8f938dc539d1fa34,
title = "Why withdrawal from the European Union is undemocratic",
abstract = "The Lisbon Treaty from 2009 introduced the possibility for individual member states to withdraw from the European Union on the basis of a unilateral decision. But would withdrawal be democratically legitimate? In fact, the all-affected principle suggests that it is undemocratic for subunits to leave larger political units because it adversely affects other citizens without including them in the decision. However, it is unclear what the currency of this affectedness is and, hence, why withdrawal would be undemocratic. We argue that it is the effect of withdrawal on the status of citizens as free and equal that is decisive and that explains why unilateral withdrawal of subunits from larger units is democratically undesirable. Moreover, on the {\textquoteleft}all-affected status principle{\textquoteright} that we develop, even multilaterally agreed withdrawal is undemocratic because the latter diminishes the future ability of citizens to make decisions together regarding issues that affect their status as free and equal. On this basis, we conclude that it would be undemocratic for a member state to withdraw from the European Union.",
keywords = "Faculty of Social Sciences, democracy, all-affected principle, citizen status, boundary problem, EU",
author = "Olsen, {Tore Vincents} and Rostb{\o}ll, {Christian F.}",
year = "2017",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1017/S1752971917000094",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "436--465",
journal = "International Theory",
issn = "1752-9719",
publisher = "cambridge university press (cup)",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why withdrawal from the European Union is undemocratic

AU - Olsen, Tore Vincents

AU - Rostbøll, Christian F.

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - The Lisbon Treaty from 2009 introduced the possibility for individual member states to withdraw from the European Union on the basis of a unilateral decision. But would withdrawal be democratically legitimate? In fact, the all-affected principle suggests that it is undemocratic for subunits to leave larger political units because it adversely affects other citizens without including them in the decision. However, it is unclear what the currency of this affectedness is and, hence, why withdrawal would be undemocratic. We argue that it is the effect of withdrawal on the status of citizens as free and equal that is decisive and that explains why unilateral withdrawal of subunits from larger units is democratically undesirable. Moreover, on the ‘all-affected status principle’ that we develop, even multilaterally agreed withdrawal is undemocratic because the latter diminishes the future ability of citizens to make decisions together regarding issues that affect their status as free and equal. On this basis, we conclude that it would be undemocratic for a member state to withdraw from the European Union.

AB - The Lisbon Treaty from 2009 introduced the possibility for individual member states to withdraw from the European Union on the basis of a unilateral decision. But would withdrawal be democratically legitimate? In fact, the all-affected principle suggests that it is undemocratic for subunits to leave larger political units because it adversely affects other citizens without including them in the decision. However, it is unclear what the currency of this affectedness is and, hence, why withdrawal would be undemocratic. We argue that it is the effect of withdrawal on the status of citizens as free and equal that is decisive and that explains why unilateral withdrawal of subunits from larger units is democratically undesirable. Moreover, on the ‘all-affected status principle’ that we develop, even multilaterally agreed withdrawal is undemocratic because the latter diminishes the future ability of citizens to make decisions together regarding issues that affect their status as free and equal. On this basis, we conclude that it would be undemocratic for a member state to withdraw from the European Union.

KW - Faculty of Social Sciences

KW - democracy

KW - all-affected principle

KW - citizen status

KW - boundary problem

KW - EU

U2 - 10.1017/S1752971917000094

DO - 10.1017/S1752971917000094

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 436

EP - 465

JO - International Theory

JF - International Theory

SN - 1752-9719

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 172275625