Regrammation and paradigmatization: Diachronic analysis of a number of progressive periphrases in French

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Regrammation and paradigmatization : Diachronic analysis of a number of progressive periphrases in French. / Kragh, Kirsten A. Jeppesen; Schøsler, Lene.

In: Journal of French Language Studies, Vol. 25, No. 2, 07.2015, p. 265-293.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Kragh, KAJ & Schøsler, L 2015, 'Regrammation and paradigmatization: Diachronic analysis of a number of progressive periphrases in French', Journal of French Language Studies, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 265-293.

APA

Kragh, K. A. J., & Schøsler, L. (2015). Regrammation and paradigmatization: Diachronic analysis of a number of progressive periphrases in French. Journal of French Language Studies, 25(2), 265-293.

Vancouver

Kragh KAJ, Schøsler L. Regrammation and paradigmatization: Diachronic analysis of a number of progressive periphrases in French. Journal of French Language Studies. 2015 Jul;25(2):265-293.

Author

Kragh, Kirsten A. Jeppesen ; Schøsler, Lene. / Regrammation and paradigmatization : Diachronic analysis of a number of progressive periphrases in French. In: Journal of French Language Studies. 2015 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 265-293.

Bibtex

@article{026b2c492a4f440fb2c38a045ff5f5f8,
title = "Regrammation and paradigmatization: Diachronic analysis of a number of progressive periphrases in French",
abstract = "In the present paper, our purpose is to characterise each of the periphrases expressing progressivity Pierre est / va / s{\textquoteright}en va / vient / s{\textquoteright}en vient chantant, Pierre est {\`a} / apr{\`e}s chanter, Pierre est en train de chanter as members of a progressive paradigm, and to provide arguments in favour of including the so-called deictic relative construction (Je vois) Pierre qui chante in this paradigm. Our arguments comprise diachronic, diastratic, Francophone, and Creole evidence. In Kragh & Sch{\o}sler (2014), we have examined in detail this construction, focusing on the grammaticalisation process and, in particular, on the reanalysis and actualisation process. We here propose an analysis of the deictic relative as yet another way of expressing progressivity. If our analysis is correct, the deictic relative should be considered as a member of the French tense, aspect, and mode (TAM) paradigm",
author = "Kragh, {Kirsten A. Jeppesen} and Lene Sch{\o}sler",
year = "2015",
month = jul,
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "265--293",
journal = "Journal of French Language Studies",
issn = "0959-2695",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regrammation and paradigmatization

T2 - Diachronic analysis of a number of progressive periphrases in French

AU - Kragh, Kirsten A. Jeppesen

AU - Schøsler, Lene

PY - 2015/7

Y1 - 2015/7

N2 - In the present paper, our purpose is to characterise each of the periphrases expressing progressivity Pierre est / va / s’en va / vient / s’en vient chantant, Pierre est à / après chanter, Pierre est en train de chanter as members of a progressive paradigm, and to provide arguments in favour of including the so-called deictic relative construction (Je vois) Pierre qui chante in this paradigm. Our arguments comprise diachronic, diastratic, Francophone, and Creole evidence. In Kragh & Schøsler (2014), we have examined in detail this construction, focusing on the grammaticalisation process and, in particular, on the reanalysis and actualisation process. We here propose an analysis of the deictic relative as yet another way of expressing progressivity. If our analysis is correct, the deictic relative should be considered as a member of the French tense, aspect, and mode (TAM) paradigm

AB - In the present paper, our purpose is to characterise each of the periphrases expressing progressivity Pierre est / va / s’en va / vient / s’en vient chantant, Pierre est à / après chanter, Pierre est en train de chanter as members of a progressive paradigm, and to provide arguments in favour of including the so-called deictic relative construction (Je vois) Pierre qui chante in this paradigm. Our arguments comprise diachronic, diastratic, Francophone, and Creole evidence. In Kragh & Schøsler (2014), we have examined in detail this construction, focusing on the grammaticalisation process and, in particular, on the reanalysis and actualisation process. We here propose an analysis of the deictic relative as yet another way of expressing progressivity. If our analysis is correct, the deictic relative should be considered as a member of the French tense, aspect, and mode (TAM) paradigm

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 265

EP - 293

JO - Journal of French Language Studies

JF - Journal of French Language Studies

SN - 0959-2695

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 140165282