The Implementation of an Electronic Health Record: Comparing Preparations for Epic in Norway with Experiences from the UK and Denmark

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Implementation of an Electronic Health Record: Comparing Preparations for Epic in Norway with Experiences from the UK and Denmark. / Hertzum, Morten; Ellingsen, Gunnar.

In: International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 129, 2019, p. 312-317.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hertzum, M & Ellingsen, G 2019, 'The Implementation of an Electronic Health Record: Comparing Preparations for Epic in Norway with Experiences from the UK and Denmark', International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 129, pp. 312-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.026

APA

Hertzum, M., & Ellingsen, G. (2019). The Implementation of an Electronic Health Record: Comparing Preparations for Epic in Norway with Experiences from the UK and Denmark. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 129, 312-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.026

Vancouver

Hertzum M, Ellingsen G. The Implementation of an Electronic Health Record: Comparing Preparations for Epic in Norway with Experiences from the UK and Denmark. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2019;129:312-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.026

Author

Hertzum, Morten ; Ellingsen, Gunnar. / The Implementation of an Electronic Health Record: Comparing Preparations for Epic in Norway with Experiences from the UK and Denmark. In: International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2019 ; Vol. 129. pp. 312-317.

Bibtex

@article{12c4a7c70f6f4d749b59017245283793,
title = "The Implementation of an Electronic Health Record: Comparing Preparations for Epic in Norway with Experiences from the UK and Denmark",
abstract = "Background – The implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) requires careful preparations but may still cause trouble. In this study we focus on one EHR – Epic.Purpose – We compare the experiences from implementing Epic in the UK and Denmark with the preparations for implementing it in Norway.Method – The study is based on document analysis (UK and Denmark) and interviews (Norway).Results – Epic had a troubled start in both the UK and Denmark with malfunctions in the interfaces to other clinical systems, disruptions in the continuity of care, and drops in performance. While the state of routine use has subsequently been reached in the UK, the transition process is still ongoing in Denmark. In Norway experiences from, especially, Denmark are heeded in planning the implementation of Epic, which is expected to deliver better care more efficiently. We discuss six pitfalls to achieving these benefits.Conclusion – Experiences from, especially, Denmark inform the Norwegian preparations, but these experiences point toward more challenges than solutions. The implementation of Epic in Norway is currently in a state of considerable uncertainty.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Electronic Health Records, Adoption, Implementation",
author = "Morten Hertzum and Gunnar Ellingsen",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.026",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "312--317",
journal = "International Journal of Medical Informatics",
issn = "1386-5056",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Implementation of an Electronic Health Record: Comparing Preparations for Epic in Norway with Experiences from the UK and Denmark

AU - Hertzum, Morten

AU - Ellingsen, Gunnar

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Background – The implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) requires careful preparations but may still cause trouble. In this study we focus on one EHR – Epic.Purpose – We compare the experiences from implementing Epic in the UK and Denmark with the preparations for implementing it in Norway.Method – The study is based on document analysis (UK and Denmark) and interviews (Norway).Results – Epic had a troubled start in both the UK and Denmark with malfunctions in the interfaces to other clinical systems, disruptions in the continuity of care, and drops in performance. While the state of routine use has subsequently been reached in the UK, the transition process is still ongoing in Denmark. In Norway experiences from, especially, Denmark are heeded in planning the implementation of Epic, which is expected to deliver better care more efficiently. We discuss six pitfalls to achieving these benefits.Conclusion – Experiences from, especially, Denmark inform the Norwegian preparations, but these experiences point toward more challenges than solutions. The implementation of Epic in Norway is currently in a state of considerable uncertainty.

AB - Background – The implementation of electronic health records (EHRs) requires careful preparations but may still cause trouble. In this study we focus on one EHR – Epic.Purpose – We compare the experiences from implementing Epic in the UK and Denmark with the preparations for implementing it in Norway.Method – The study is based on document analysis (UK and Denmark) and interviews (Norway).Results – Epic had a troubled start in both the UK and Denmark with malfunctions in the interfaces to other clinical systems, disruptions in the continuity of care, and drops in performance. While the state of routine use has subsequently been reached in the UK, the transition process is still ongoing in Denmark. In Norway experiences from, especially, Denmark are heeded in planning the implementation of Epic, which is expected to deliver better care more efficiently. We discuss six pitfalls to achieving these benefits.Conclusion – Experiences from, especially, Denmark inform the Norwegian preparations, but these experiences point toward more challenges than solutions. The implementation of Epic in Norway is currently in a state of considerable uncertainty.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Electronic Health Records

KW - Adoption

KW - Implementation

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.026

DO - 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.06.026

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31445272

VL - 129

SP - 312

EP - 317

JO - International Journal of Medical Informatics

JF - International Journal of Medical Informatics

SN - 1386-5056

ER -

ID: 223990890