For deliberative disagreement: Its venues, varieties and values

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

For deliberative disagreement : Its venues, varieties and values. / Kock, Christian Erik J.

I: Paradigmi, Bind 36, Nr. 3, 12.2018, s. 477-498.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Kock, CEJ 2018, 'For deliberative disagreement: Its venues, varieties and values', Paradigmi, bind 36, nr. 3, s. 477-498. https://doi.org/10.30460/91903

APA

Kock, C. E. J. (2018). For deliberative disagreement: Its venues, varieties and values. Paradigmi, 36(3), 477-498. https://doi.org/10.30460/91903

Vancouver

Kock CEJ. For deliberative disagreement: Its venues, varieties and values. Paradigmi. 2018 dec.;36(3):477-498. https://doi.org/10.30460/91903

Author

Kock, Christian Erik J. / For deliberative disagreement : Its venues, varieties and values. I: Paradigmi. 2018 ; Bind 36, Nr. 3. s. 477-498.

Bibtex

@article{e20f45f385154950b0032c672b472659,
title = "For deliberative disagreement: Its venues, varieties and values",
abstract = "I outline a theory of deliberative debate, its distinctive features and the kind of normative criteria that may be posited for it in light of its distinctive features. Deliberative debate is a type of practical reasoning: ultimately it is not about what is true, but about what to do. From this follows several characteristics, primarily that there will normally be good reasons on both sides of an issue. I criticize prevalent conceptions of argumentation and outline an alternative, discussing contexts and varieties of deliberation and proposing normative criteria based on a citizen-centered view of the function of deliberation.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, practical reasoning, deliberation, rhetoric, disagreement, consensus, multidimensionality",
author = "Kock, {Christian Erik J}",
year = "2018",
month = dec,
doi = "10.30460/91903",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "477--498",
journal = "Paradigmi",
issn = "1120-3404",
publisher = "Edizioni FrancoAngeli",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - For deliberative disagreement

T2 - Its venues, varieties and values

AU - Kock, Christian Erik J

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - I outline a theory of deliberative debate, its distinctive features and the kind of normative criteria that may be posited for it in light of its distinctive features. Deliberative debate is a type of practical reasoning: ultimately it is not about what is true, but about what to do. From this follows several characteristics, primarily that there will normally be good reasons on both sides of an issue. I criticize prevalent conceptions of argumentation and outline an alternative, discussing contexts and varieties of deliberation and proposing normative criteria based on a citizen-centered view of the function of deliberation.

AB - I outline a theory of deliberative debate, its distinctive features and the kind of normative criteria that may be posited for it in light of its distinctive features. Deliberative debate is a type of practical reasoning: ultimately it is not about what is true, but about what to do. From this follows several characteristics, primarily that there will normally be good reasons on both sides of an issue. I criticize prevalent conceptions of argumentation and outline an alternative, discussing contexts and varieties of deliberation and proposing normative criteria based on a citizen-centered view of the function of deliberation.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - practical reasoning

KW - deliberation

KW - rhetoric

KW - disagreement

KW - consensus

KW - multidimensionality

U2 - 10.30460/91903

DO - 10.30460/91903

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 477

EP - 498

JO - Paradigmi

JF - Paradigmi

SN - 1120-3404

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 184836946