The Rhetoric of Divination: A Comparative Approach

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportBidrag til bog/antologiForskningfagfællebedømt

In a comparative analysis of divinatory practices, such as Christian manna-grains, Yijing, Ifa divination, the Delphic oracle, and modern-day Tarot, this chapter argues that the rhetoric of divination may be studied in three phases: 1) The rhetoric of the act of divination is inherent in the stochastic procedure itself; its outcome parades as the result of fate, chance, a god, or dao. In addition, there is often a myth to account for the procedure. 2) The stochastic procedure nominates a text to be interpreted, e.g. a passage of holy writ, a time-honoured earlier prediction, or a proverb. It is not a straightforward verdict or prediction, but as ritually nominated, it claims relevance. The rhetoric of the text resides in its character as a model to be applied to the matter at hand. 3) The rhetoric of interpretation, then, consists in establishing a convincing continuity between the text and the matter at hand. In sum, the rhetoric of divination is very much a metamorphosis of signs: the act of divination produces a sign, from the beginning without meaning; this is turned into a linguistic sign that does not yet make sense. Finally, the interpretation establishes the full sense, uniting religious authority and relevance.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelTheoretical and Empirical Investigations of Divination and Magic : Manipulating the Divine
RedaktørerJesper Frøkjær Sørensen, Anders Klostergaard Petersen
Antal sider33
UdgivelsesstedLeiden
ForlagBrill
Publikationsdato2021
Sider41-73
Kapitel3
ISBN (Trykt)9789004447578
ISBN (Elektronisk)9789004447585
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2021
NavnNumen Book Series
Vol/bind171
ISSN0169-8834

ID: 261408606