The fallacy of the cognitive free fall in communication metaphor - a semiotic analysis
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
The fallacy of the cognitive free fall in communication metaphor - a semiotic analysis. / Thellefsen, Martin Muderspach; Thellefsen, Torkild Leo; Sørensen, Bent.
In: Library Trends, Vol. 63, No. 3, 2015, p. 512-527.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The fallacy of the cognitive free fall in communication metaphor - a semiotic analysis
AU - Thellefsen, Martin Muderspach
AU - Thellefsen, Torkild Leo
AU - Sørensen, Bent
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - This article is a theoretical analysis of the cognitive free fall metaphor, used within the cognitive view, as model for explaining the communication process between a generator and receiver of a message. The aim is to demonstrate that the idea of a cognitive free fall taking place within this communication process leads to apparent theoretical paradoxes, that partly is fostered by unclear definitions of key information science concepts, namely tokens, signs, information and knowledge, and there interrelatedness, and a naïve theoretical framework. The article promote a semeiotically inspired model of communication, that demonstrate that what takes place in communication, is not a cognitive free fall, but rather a fall from a pragmatic level of knowing or knowledge to a level of representation or information. The article furthermore argue that the communication process more ideally can be expressed as a complex interrelation of emotion, information and cognition.
AB - This article is a theoretical analysis of the cognitive free fall metaphor, used within the cognitive view, as model for explaining the communication process between a generator and receiver of a message. The aim is to demonstrate that the idea of a cognitive free fall taking place within this communication process leads to apparent theoretical paradoxes, that partly is fostered by unclear definitions of key information science concepts, namely tokens, signs, information and knowledge, and there interrelatedness, and a naïve theoretical framework. The article promote a semeiotically inspired model of communication, that demonstrate that what takes place in communication, is not a cognitive free fall, but rather a fall from a pragmatic level of knowing or knowledge to a level of representation or information. The article furthermore argue that the communication process more ideally can be expressed as a complex interrelation of emotion, information and cognition.
KW - Faculty of Humanities
KW - Information Science
KW - cognitive view
KW - Semiotics
U2 - 10.1353/lib.2015.0011
DO - 10.1353/lib.2015.0011
M3 - Journal article
VL - 63
SP - 512
EP - 527
JO - Library Trends
JF - Library Trends
SN - 0024-2594
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 118096306