Lexical and constructional organization of argument structure: a contrastive analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning

Standard

Lexical and constructional organization of argument structure: a contrastive analysis. / Pedersen, Johan.

Studies in Language and Cognition. red. / Jordan Zlatev; Mats Andrén; Marlene Johansson Falck; Carita Lundmark. Bind 1 Cambridge : Cambridge Scholars Press, 2009. s. 241-256.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning

Harvard

Pedersen, J 2009, Lexical and constructional organization of argument structure: a contrastive analysis. i J Zlatev, M Andrén, M Johansson Falck & C Lundmark (red), Studies in Language and Cognition. bind 1, Cambridge Scholars Press, Cambridge, s. 241-256.

APA

Pedersen, J. (2009). Lexical and constructional organization of argument structure: a contrastive analysis. I J. Zlatev, M. Andrén, M. Johansson Falck, & C. Lundmark (red.), Studies in Language and Cognition (Bind 1, s. 241-256). Cambridge Scholars Press.

Vancouver

Pedersen J. Lexical and constructional organization of argument structure: a contrastive analysis. I Zlatev J, Andrén M, Johansson Falck M, Lundmark C, red., Studies in Language and Cognition. Bind 1. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press. 2009. s. 241-256

Author

Pedersen, Johan. / Lexical and constructional organization of argument structure: a contrastive analysis. Studies in Language and Cognition. red. / Jordan Zlatev ; Mats Andrén ; Marlene Johansson Falck ; Carita Lundmark. Bind 1 Cambridge : Cambridge Scholars Press, 2009. s. 241-256

Bibtex

@inbook{23535520a0a711debc73000ea68e967b,
title = "Lexical and constructional organization of argument structure: a contrastive analysis",
abstract = "Abstract. In this chapter I outline some principles for a contrastive analysis of basic clausal expressions in English and Spanish. They are formulated within a general framework of Cognitive Linguistics. The proposed principles for cross-linguistic variation are a challenge to the principles of parametric variation in syntax as envisioned in Chomsky (1981) and defended by Snyder (2001). From a theory-internal point of view, they lead to a reinterpretation of Talmy's descriptive typology of macro-events (Talmy 1991, 2000). Particularly, they solve a serious flaw in Talmy's typology due to his exclusive focus on lexicalization patterns. Contrastive analysis may provide insight into differing ways of organizing grammatical information. Construction grammar (CXG) suggests that clausal core information is organized by integrating at least two construction types: A) schematic constructions, B) lexical constructions (e.g. Croft 2001; Fillmore 1988; Goldberg 1995, 2006). In addition, clausal expressions are, according to some CXG-frameworks (e.g. Croft 2001), supposed to be built on language-specific construction types. I hypothesize that languages may differ according to the level of constructional specificity at which the core information is organized. English (and presumably other Germanic languages to some extent) tends to organize principal clausal information in schematic argument structure constructions, lea­ving secondary information for lexical (verbal) specification. Spanish (and presumably other Romance languages to some extent) seems to organize principal clausal information lexically in verbal argument structure constructions, leaving secondary information for schematically organized specification.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Argumentstruktur, Sprogtypologi, Konstruktionsgrammatik, Spansk sprog, Argument structure, Language typology, Construction grammar, Spanish language",
author = "Johan Pedersen",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
isbn = "1-4438-0174-7",
volume = "1",
pages = "241--256",
editor = "Jordan Zlatev and Mats Andr{\'e}n and {Johansson Falck}, Marlene and Carita Lundmark",
booktitle = "Studies in Language and Cognition",
publisher = "Cambridge Scholars Press",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Lexical and constructional organization of argument structure: a contrastive analysis

AU - Pedersen, Johan

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Abstract. In this chapter I outline some principles for a contrastive analysis of basic clausal expressions in English and Spanish. They are formulated within a general framework of Cognitive Linguistics. The proposed principles for cross-linguistic variation are a challenge to the principles of parametric variation in syntax as envisioned in Chomsky (1981) and defended by Snyder (2001). From a theory-internal point of view, they lead to a reinterpretation of Talmy's descriptive typology of macro-events (Talmy 1991, 2000). Particularly, they solve a serious flaw in Talmy's typology due to his exclusive focus on lexicalization patterns. Contrastive analysis may provide insight into differing ways of organizing grammatical information. Construction grammar (CXG) suggests that clausal core information is organized by integrating at least two construction types: A) schematic constructions, B) lexical constructions (e.g. Croft 2001; Fillmore 1988; Goldberg 1995, 2006). In addition, clausal expressions are, according to some CXG-frameworks (e.g. Croft 2001), supposed to be built on language-specific construction types. I hypothesize that languages may differ according to the level of constructional specificity at which the core information is organized. English (and presumably other Germanic languages to some extent) tends to organize principal clausal information in schematic argument structure constructions, lea­ving secondary information for lexical (verbal) specification. Spanish (and presumably other Romance languages to some extent) seems to organize principal clausal information lexically in verbal argument structure constructions, leaving secondary information for schematically organized specification.

AB - Abstract. In this chapter I outline some principles for a contrastive analysis of basic clausal expressions in English and Spanish. They are formulated within a general framework of Cognitive Linguistics. The proposed principles for cross-linguistic variation are a challenge to the principles of parametric variation in syntax as envisioned in Chomsky (1981) and defended by Snyder (2001). From a theory-internal point of view, they lead to a reinterpretation of Talmy's descriptive typology of macro-events (Talmy 1991, 2000). Particularly, they solve a serious flaw in Talmy's typology due to his exclusive focus on lexicalization patterns. Contrastive analysis may provide insight into differing ways of organizing grammatical information. Construction grammar (CXG) suggests that clausal core information is organized by integrating at least two construction types: A) schematic constructions, B) lexical constructions (e.g. Croft 2001; Fillmore 1988; Goldberg 1995, 2006). In addition, clausal expressions are, according to some CXG-frameworks (e.g. Croft 2001), supposed to be built on language-specific construction types. I hypothesize that languages may differ according to the level of constructional specificity at which the core information is organized. English (and presumably other Germanic languages to some extent) tends to organize principal clausal information in schematic argument structure constructions, lea­ving secondary information for lexical (verbal) specification. Spanish (and presumably other Romance languages to some extent) seems to organize principal clausal information lexically in verbal argument structure constructions, leaving secondary information for schematically organized specification.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Argumentstruktur

KW - Sprogtypologi

KW - Konstruktionsgrammatik

KW - Spansk sprog

KW - Argument structure

KW - Language typology

KW - Construction grammar

KW - Spanish language

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 1-4438-0174-7

VL - 1

SP - 241

EP - 256

BT - Studies in Language and Cognition

A2 - Zlatev, Jordan

A2 - Andrén, Mats

A2 - Johansson Falck, Marlene

A2 - Lundmark, Carita

PB - Cambridge Scholars Press

CY - Cambridge

ER -

ID: 14388105