The interactional establishment of the membership category ‘nonnative speaker’ in gatekeeping encounters

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

The interactional establishment of the membership category ‘nonnative speaker’ in gatekeeping encounters. / Tranekjær, Louise; Kappa, Katherine.

Pragmatics and Language Learning. red. / Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig; J. César Félix-Brasdefer. Bind 14 National Foreign Language Resource Center, 2016. s. 93-122.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapportKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Tranekjær, L & Kappa, K 2016, The interactional establishment of the membership category ‘nonnative speaker’ in gatekeeping encounters. i K Bardovi-Harlig & JC Félix-Brasdefer (red), Pragmatics and Language Learning. bind 14, National Foreign Language Resource Center, s. 93-122.

APA

Tranekjær, L., & Kappa, K. (2016). The interactional establishment of the membership category ‘nonnative speaker’ in gatekeeping encounters. I K. Bardovi-Harlig, & J. C. Félix-Brasdefer (red.), Pragmatics and Language Learning (Bind 14, s. 93-122). National Foreign Language Resource Center.

Vancouver

Tranekjær L, Kappa K. The interactional establishment of the membership category ‘nonnative speaker’ in gatekeeping encounters. I Bardovi-Harlig K, Félix-Brasdefer JC, red., Pragmatics and Language Learning. Bind 14. National Foreign Language Resource Center. 2016. s. 93-122

Author

Tranekjær, Louise ; Kappa, Katherine. / The interactional establishment of the membership category ‘nonnative speaker’ in gatekeeping encounters. Pragmatics and Language Learning. red. / Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig ; J. César Félix-Brasdefer. Bind 14 National Foreign Language Resource Center, 2016. s. 93-122

Bibtex

@inproceedings{e9fbb01cf14b45e587f86407bfa6295b,
title = "The interactional establishment of the membership category {\textquoteleft}nonnative speaker{\textquoteright} in gatekeeping encounters",
abstract = "This paper examines how the membership category {\textquoteleft}nonnative speaker{\textquoteright} is interactionally established and initiated by the {\textquoteleft}native speaker{\textquoteright} interviewers during internship interviews between Danish employers and born abroad1 candidates. The analysis is based on 16 recorded internship interviews and related to studies that demonstrate how membership categories are fundamentally indexical of the context of interaction (Day, 2006; Drew & Heritage, 1992; Mondada, 2004). By taking on a membership categorization analysis (MCA) approach and utilizing conversation analytic (CA) tools, this paper shows three different ways in which the interviewers orient to and establish the candidate as a member of the category {\textquoteleft}nonnative speaker{\textquoteright} without performing other-repair. Thus, the paper focuses on orientations to proficiency that are not related to linguistic errors or repair-sequences. The direct address of the interviewers{\textquoteright} orientations to the candidates{\textquoteright} proficiency in our data is noteworthy as it is in stark contrast to previous research which show that other-repair is rarely initiated by native speakers in native/nonnative speaker settings. We argue that language-related membership categorization processes are problematic in institutional settings, such as the interviews analyzed here, as they contribute to the gatekeeping effect of the speech situation by reproducing asymmetrical power relations.",
author = "Louise Tranekj{\ae}r and Katherine Kappa",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
language = "English",
isbn = "9780983581680",
volume = "14",
pages = "93--122",
editor = "Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig and F{\'e}lix-Brasdefer, {J. C{\'e}sar}",
booktitle = "Pragmatics and Language Learning",
publisher = "National Foreign Language Resource Center",
address = "United States",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - The interactional establishment of the membership category ‘nonnative speaker’ in gatekeeping encounters

AU - Tranekjær, Louise

AU - Kappa, Katherine

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - This paper examines how the membership category ‘nonnative speaker’ is interactionally established and initiated by the ‘native speaker’ interviewers during internship interviews between Danish employers and born abroad1 candidates. The analysis is based on 16 recorded internship interviews and related to studies that demonstrate how membership categories are fundamentally indexical of the context of interaction (Day, 2006; Drew & Heritage, 1992; Mondada, 2004). By taking on a membership categorization analysis (MCA) approach and utilizing conversation analytic (CA) tools, this paper shows three different ways in which the interviewers orient to and establish the candidate as a member of the category ‘nonnative speaker’ without performing other-repair. Thus, the paper focuses on orientations to proficiency that are not related to linguistic errors or repair-sequences. The direct address of the interviewers’ orientations to the candidates’ proficiency in our data is noteworthy as it is in stark contrast to previous research which show that other-repair is rarely initiated by native speakers in native/nonnative speaker settings. We argue that language-related membership categorization processes are problematic in institutional settings, such as the interviews analyzed here, as they contribute to the gatekeeping effect of the speech situation by reproducing asymmetrical power relations.

AB - This paper examines how the membership category ‘nonnative speaker’ is interactionally established and initiated by the ‘native speaker’ interviewers during internship interviews between Danish employers and born abroad1 candidates. The analysis is based on 16 recorded internship interviews and related to studies that demonstrate how membership categories are fundamentally indexical of the context of interaction (Day, 2006; Drew & Heritage, 1992; Mondada, 2004). By taking on a membership categorization analysis (MCA) approach and utilizing conversation analytic (CA) tools, this paper shows three different ways in which the interviewers orient to and establish the candidate as a member of the category ‘nonnative speaker’ without performing other-repair. Thus, the paper focuses on orientations to proficiency that are not related to linguistic errors or repair-sequences. The direct address of the interviewers’ orientations to the candidates’ proficiency in our data is noteworthy as it is in stark contrast to previous research which show that other-repair is rarely initiated by native speakers in native/nonnative speaker settings. We argue that language-related membership categorization processes are problematic in institutional settings, such as the interviews analyzed here, as they contribute to the gatekeeping effect of the speech situation by reproducing asymmetrical power relations.

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 9780983581680

VL - 14

SP - 93

EP - 122

BT - Pragmatics and Language Learning

A2 - Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen

A2 - Félix-Brasdefer, J. César

PB - National Foreign Language Resource Center

ER -

ID: 165399838