The Legacy of the Past in Brexit Britain: A study of the influence of the cultural memory of empire on British Euroscepticism
Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapport › Ph.d.-afhandling › Forskning
Standard
The Legacy of the Past in Brexit Britain : A study of the influence of the cultural memory of empire on British Euroscepticism. / Djurhuus, Tóra.
2022. 207 s.Publikation: Bog/antologi/afhandling/rapport › Ph.d.-afhandling › Forskning
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - BOOK
T1 - The Legacy of the Past in Brexit Britain
T2 - A study of the influence of the cultural memory of empire on British Euroscepticism
AU - Djurhuus, Tóra
PY - 2022/3/1
Y1 - 2022/3/1
N2 - Although the British Empire came to a rapid conclusion in the decades following the Second World War, the memory of empire has continued to influence ideas of national identity and purpose and has certainly also shaped Britain’s approach to European cooperation. This this thesis brings together ideas from memory studies and British Euroscepticism, as it examines how the cultural memory of empire has been used in political and cultural debates in Britain to create a narrative of national identity, especially in relation to the European Union, and, in turn, what this means for Britain’s ability to carve out a future role for itself outside the EU. In terms of memory theory, I rely on the terms ‘pre’ and ‘remediation’ which describe the process through which cultural memory isgenerated, maintained, and, yet, constantly reconstructed according to contemporary times and challenges.The thesis takes its point of departure in written material produced by key political players in the Eurosceptic/Brexit debate such as Boris Johnson and Daniel Hannan, as well as texts from the editorial and comment sections of the Daily Telegraph, the Sunday Telegraph, and the Daily Mail. Based on an analysis of recurring tropes in the primary source material (from 1995-2017), myargument is twofold: Firstly, I argue that references to the British Empire were common in the debate on Europe in the early 1960s, yet that these disappeared following the 1975 referendum, only to be resurrected – in a completely different and reimagined form – in the immediate years leading up to the Brexit referendum. Secondly, I argue that pro-Brexit actors mobilised the cultural memory of empire when making their respective arguments against membership of the European Union. Yet this mobilisation occurred in coded form. In other words, what I refer to as the ‘imperial dimension’ ofBritish Eurosceptic rhetoric manifested itself largely in the way in which Eurosceptics talked about Britain’s global connections and free trade. In this sense, in British Eurosceptic debate, ‘the imperial dimension’ functioned as a readymade rhetorical resource through which an alternative, better futurefor Britain outside the EU could be articulated.
AB - Although the British Empire came to a rapid conclusion in the decades following the Second World War, the memory of empire has continued to influence ideas of national identity and purpose and has certainly also shaped Britain’s approach to European cooperation. This this thesis brings together ideas from memory studies and British Euroscepticism, as it examines how the cultural memory of empire has been used in political and cultural debates in Britain to create a narrative of national identity, especially in relation to the European Union, and, in turn, what this means for Britain’s ability to carve out a future role for itself outside the EU. In terms of memory theory, I rely on the terms ‘pre’ and ‘remediation’ which describe the process through which cultural memory isgenerated, maintained, and, yet, constantly reconstructed according to contemporary times and challenges.The thesis takes its point of departure in written material produced by key political players in the Eurosceptic/Brexit debate such as Boris Johnson and Daniel Hannan, as well as texts from the editorial and comment sections of the Daily Telegraph, the Sunday Telegraph, and the Daily Mail. Based on an analysis of recurring tropes in the primary source material (from 1995-2017), myargument is twofold: Firstly, I argue that references to the British Empire were common in the debate on Europe in the early 1960s, yet that these disappeared following the 1975 referendum, only to be resurrected – in a completely different and reimagined form – in the immediate years leading up to the Brexit referendum. Secondly, I argue that pro-Brexit actors mobilised the cultural memory of empire when making their respective arguments against membership of the European Union. Yet this mobilisation occurred in coded form. In other words, what I refer to as the ‘imperial dimension’ ofBritish Eurosceptic rhetoric manifested itself largely in the way in which Eurosceptics talked about Britain’s global connections and free trade. In this sense, in British Eurosceptic debate, ‘the imperial dimension’ functioned as a readymade rhetorical resource through which an alternative, better futurefor Britain outside the EU could be articulated.
M3 - Ph.D. thesis
BT - The Legacy of the Past in Brexit Britain
ER -
ID: 308547865