Usability Testing: Too Early? Too Much Talking? Too Many Problems?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Usability Testing: Too Early? Too Much Talking? Too Many Problems? / Hertzum, Morten.

I: Journal of Usability Studies, Bind 11, Nr. 3, 2016, s. 83-88.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hertzum, M 2016, 'Usability Testing: Too Early? Too Much Talking? Too Many Problems?', Journal of Usability Studies, bind 11, nr. 3, s. 83-88.

APA

Hertzum, M. (2016). Usability Testing: Too Early? Too Much Talking? Too Many Problems? Journal of Usability Studies, 11(3), 83-88.

Vancouver

Hertzum M. Usability Testing: Too Early? Too Much Talking? Too Many Problems? Journal of Usability Studies. 2016;11(3):83-88.

Author

Hertzum, Morten. / Usability Testing: Too Early? Too Much Talking? Too Many Problems?. I: Journal of Usability Studies. 2016 ; Bind 11, Nr. 3. s. 83-88.

Bibtex

@article{041a65276c6c46dd81f237c8f59f37db,
title = "Usability Testing: Too Early? Too Much Talking? Too Many Problems?",
abstract = "Usability testing has evolved in response to a search for tests that are cheap, early, easy, and fast. In addition, it accords with a situational definition of usability, such as the one propounded by ISO. By approaching usability from an organizational perspective, this author argues that usability should (also) be evaluated late, that usability professionals should be wary of thinking aloud, and that they should focus more on effects achievement than problem detection.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, usability evaluation",
author = "Morten Hertzum",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "83--88",
journal = "Journal of Usability Studies",
issn = "1931-3357",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Usability Testing: Too Early? Too Much Talking? Too Many Problems?

AU - Hertzum, Morten

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Usability testing has evolved in response to a search for tests that are cheap, early, easy, and fast. In addition, it accords with a situational definition of usability, such as the one propounded by ISO. By approaching usability from an organizational perspective, this author argues that usability should (also) be evaluated late, that usability professionals should be wary of thinking aloud, and that they should focus more on effects achievement than problem detection.

AB - Usability testing has evolved in response to a search for tests that are cheap, early, easy, and fast. In addition, it accords with a situational definition of usability, such as the one propounded by ISO. By approaching usability from an organizational perspective, this author argues that usability should (also) be evaluated late, that usability professionals should be wary of thinking aloud, and that they should focus more on effects achievement than problem detection.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - usability evaluation

UR - http://uxpajournal.org/usability-testing-early-talking-problems/

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 83

EP - 88

JO - Journal of Usability Studies

JF - Journal of Usability Studies

SN - 1931-3357

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 161634481