Embracing the ‘inverted commas’, or How COVID-19 can show us new directions for ethnographic ‘fieldwork’
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Embracing the ‘inverted commas’, or How COVID-19 can show us new directions for ethnographic ‘fieldwork’. / Eggeling, Kristin Anabel.
I: Qualitative Research, Bind 23, Nr. 5, 2023, s. 1342-1358.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Embracing the ‘inverted commas’, or How COVID-19 can show us new directions for ethnographic ‘fieldwork’
AU - Eggeling, Kristin Anabel
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Qualitative researchers often refer to the sites they study as a ‘field’ and the work they do there as ‘fieldwork’. Setting both terms in inverted commas implies that their meaning stretches beyond clean categorisation of places or methods. Taking the example of ethnographic research during the coronavirus pandemic, I argue that embracing this excess meaning opens new research perspectives when fieldwork gets disrupted. As a more hopeful intervention into a debate currently focused on lost access, immobility and professional frustration, this article puts forward alternative readings of ‘fieldwork’ as a relational and emergent process in which proximity and knowledge production are bound to sensitive research practice more than to physical (co)presence. By tragic serendipity, I argue, COVID-19 has the potential to normalise such readings against the traditional gold standard of fieldwork as extended (and often expensive) research stays in places far-away from ‘home’.
AB - Qualitative researchers often refer to the sites they study as a ‘field’ and the work they do there as ‘fieldwork’. Setting both terms in inverted commas implies that their meaning stretches beyond clean categorisation of places or methods. Taking the example of ethnographic research during the coronavirus pandemic, I argue that embracing this excess meaning opens new research perspectives when fieldwork gets disrupted. As a more hopeful intervention into a debate currently focused on lost access, immobility and professional frustration, this article puts forward alternative readings of ‘fieldwork’ as a relational and emergent process in which proximity and knowledge production are bound to sensitive research practice more than to physical (co)presence. By tragic serendipity, I argue, COVID-19 has the potential to normalise such readings against the traditional gold standard of fieldwork as extended (and often expensive) research stays in places far-away from ‘home’.
KW - Faculty of Social Sciences
KW - fieldwork
KW - ethnography
KW - Covid-19
KW - disruption
KW - serendipity
KW - diplomacy
KW - hope
U2 - 10.1177/14687941221096594
DO - 10.1177/14687941221096594
M3 - Journal article
VL - 23
SP - 1342
EP - 1358
JO - Qualitative Research
JF - Qualitative Research
SN - 1468-7941
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 305860079